|
|
Employers who ignore
stress face legal action

The Government is to
crack down on stress at work with a tough new code, which for the first time
will put employers at risk of legal action if they ignore the issue. The code,
published today by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE), sets six standards
aimed at easing the pressure and improving the quality of life in the office and
on the shop floor. They include reducing job demands, increasing support and
giving staff more control over their work.
The code will introduce a legal basis against which companies can be assessed
for their efforts to reduce stress to manageable levels. If fewer than 65 to 85
per cent of staff agree that each standard has been met, the company will fail
the assessment.
Under the Health and
Safety at Work Act, companies can be sued for causing unnecessary stress at
work. But cases are difficult to prove and no prosecutions have been brought by
the HSE. "The management standards will be what we expect companies to do to
manage the stress in their workplace," an HSE spokeswoman said. "They will be
equivalent to the Highway Code. It will make it easier for employees to bring
actions and our inspectors will be able to go in and see if companies are up to
the standards."
More than 13 million
work days a year are lost because of stress, which affects one in five of all
employees at a cost of up to £3.8bn, the HSE says.
Bill Callaghan, the chairman of the Health and Safety Commission, said: "We know
there is considerable pressure in the modern workplace but there is a difference
between the buzz people get from doing a busy and challenging job and an
unreasonable pressure, which can harm health, lead to absence and put additional
strain on their colleagues trying to cope in an even more pressured environment.
|
|
"Handing
[companies] a tool to help them develop good practice makes sense and the
earlier the better. I know this is not going to be easy but grasping this nettle
can make for a successful business and a happier workforce."
Companies are being
invited to implement the standards, tested in 24 firms, from today. The
standards will be fine-tuned until the code is formally launched next year.
The code is based on evidence from the Whitehall II study of 10,000 civil
servants who have been followed since 1985. The study, by Professor Sir Michael
Marmot and colleagues of University College London, found staff could cope with
high-pressure work environments, without damage to their health, provided they
had a high degree of control over their working lives and good social support.
In pilot studies of
the code, to uncover hidden problems companies including Sainsbury's and Lloyds
TSB have focused on areas where sickness absence is highest, turnover of staff
is rising or productivity is falling. Staff have been asked to fill in
questionnaires to rate the company against the six standards.
Claire Forty, the occupational health manager at the energy company Innogy, said
700 of more than 2,000 staff had been surveyed and the pilot test had revealed
some groups were concerned at excessive demands and others about lack of
control. "We have a lot of people who work a long way from where they live so
flexible working, including working at home, is a big issue."
Companies had to acknowledge that the "whole person" came to work and pressures
at home could affect their performance at work, Ms Forty said. "If I say to my
boss I have got to come in late this week because of childcare problems I am
confident it would be accepted. Equally, if he says to me there is a big job on
and I have to come in at 7.30am each day that would be no problem.
"The benefits of meeting the standards, apart from complying with the law, are
reducing turnover and sickness absence and increasing productivity as well as
making it a great place to work. We haven't had a claim for stress against us
but it would be foolish for any employer to say they would never get one."
Elizabeth Gyngell, head of HSE's better-working environment division, said: "I
am delighted that such a wide range of companies ... are working with us to
develop standards and being so frank in helping tackle the challenges." |
|